Teching It Easy: Windows Vista & 7: My Articles

Windows Vista - The Recap 2005 to 2006

Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:07:29 GMT

So with Windows Vista RTM only a few hours away, we are on the threshold of a new era in computing. Testing Vista for over a year has been one wild ride, from the first beta in July 2005 to the many interim releases that came after. It was fun and I must say I enjoyed every minute of it and hope to do it again in the future without the long gap and wait for Beta though. So with the beta now ended I just want us to take a look back at the past 15 months:

Build 5112: Windows Vista BETA 1
Build 5219: Windows Vista September CTP
Build 5231: Windows Vista October CTP
Build 5270: Windows Vista December CTP
Build 5308: Windows Vista February CTP
Build 5536: Windows Vista Pre Release Candidate 1
Build 5600: Windows Vista Release Candidate 1

Build 6000: RTM ActiveWin Windows Vista Ultimate x86 and x64 Review New! Coming Soon.

Of course, there are some builds I didn't review, such as 5342, 5365, 5381, 5384 (BETA 2), 5456 and 5472, because they were either unusable or just not significantly different in changes to justify a review. The feature set has been pretty much frozen since Build 5308. Of course, the platform on which Vista started has not officially finished development. Windows 'codenamed' Longhorn Server will carry the torch into Q4 2007 and I hope to get a bit more interested in that release and present some reviews to see whats happening with it.

Remember to stay tuned to Teching It Easy for ongoing coverage of Windows Vista, with tips and tricks plus a new category called Vista Journal where I will be exploring and relating my everyday experiences with Windows Vista for one year, everyday (hopefully).

Resources:
Windows Vista RTM FAQ and Quick Start Guide

Technorati tags: Windows Vista, Builds, CTP, RC1, RC2, Tips and Tricks, Guide, Getting Started, Reviews, Previews, BETA, RTM, Released To Manufacturering.

A Quick Look At the New Windows Vista Multimedia and Productivity Icons

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:57:05 GMT

Since the Longhorn Project started, we have been seeing early concepts of new pictorial representations of task throughout the operating system. Over time, we have basically gotten tired of the same old thing, since we have been seeing them for so long now. Microsoft has hinted since the start of Vista BETA 1 that more fit and finish will be added to Vista as the project heads to RTM. Confirmation of this was recently revealed on Paul Thurrotts Windows Supersite for Windows with a banner linking to his soon to be release final review of Windows Vista. I would like to take a look some these changes with the new Multimedia and Productivity icons expected in the final Vista RTM code.

Windows Vista Multimedia Application icons

Windows Productivity Icons

Ok, you are saying to yourself, there is strong use of the orange African Daisy. But I like them, I did not at first, but they have grown on me really quick. They are rich, retro and edgy and use what seems to be either a Glass or plastic element for keeping your data. The use of the flower itself is representation of both beauty and workflow, you see the different scenarios in which you can control, manipulate, reuse and exploit your data. I personally did not get the DVD Maker icon off the bat, but eventually it came to me when I realized the circle was a DVD disk. For ages, Microsoft has really stuck to just slightly updating their icons, and much of this is still true, Computer, Network and others still are the same, but do they need any drastic departures as these are? Overall, its a change that communicates ease of use, fun and most of all integration, I like 'em!

Technorati tags: New Windows Vista Icons, RTM, User Experience Code, Windows Movie Maker, Windows Photo Gallery, Windows DVD Maker, Windows Mail, Windows Meeting Space, Windows Calendar, Windows Contacts, Pictorial Representations, Orange Daisy, AERO Glass, Multimedia, Productivity.

Windows Vista Packaging - What has changed?

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:02:19 GMT

Microsoft yesterday revealed the new product boxes for Windows Vista which would be considered a new age design that migrates from the traditional four edge squar box we have been using since the 80's. The new boxes seem to be in a hard polycarbonated frame which aims to protect contents from both damage and theft which is today used by Windows XP when purchased through Retail channels. When I say theft, an unscrupolous individual cannot go into a store and simply open the case take the disk out and walk away.

The consumer and business client edition Windows boxes.

According to Nick White of the Windows Vista Blog: "Designed to be user-friendly, the new packaging is a small, hard, plastic container that’s designed to protect the software inside for life-long use. It provides a convenient and attractive place for you to permanently store both discs and documentation.

The new design will provide the strength, dimensional stability and impact resistance required when packaging software today. Our plan is to extend this packaging style to other Microsoft products after the launch of Windows Vista and 2007 Office system."

Two of the new Windows product editions added to the Vista product line, Home Basic targets first time PC buyers, one PC homes and persons on a budget who want a secure, productive out of box experience. Windows Vista Ultimate is at the top of the pyramid and includes all the features from all the SKU's including a set of services called Ultimate Extras available only to Vista Ultimate customers.

The two other editions that do not have retail product boxes are Windows Vista Enterprise and Starter Edition. Vista Enterprise will only be available to Volume License customers who have a Software Assurance or Enterprise Agreement (SA/EA). Starter Edition will be available in only in emerging markets such as Asia, Africa, Brazil and Mexico to name a few through OEM vendors on new PC's. All Windows Vista retail should include both x86 and x64 platforms, with one product key, leaving the decision up to the user to choose which platform they want to install or depending on what instruction set their PC supports.

Windows XP boxes, Home and Professional.

For the traditional SKU's such as XP Home and Professional, Microsoft has remained very consistent with the Home Premium and Business Editions by retaining the familar Green and Blue themes. The two new retail SKU's Home Basic and Ultimate are different, Basic blends with green and white shade while the Ultimate box uses a strong black tone with blue Aurora accents. Missing from the packages are slogans that tell us what Vista represents. XP's slogan was "Experience the best of the digital decade", its possible because they want to deliver a very clean frontal view, this will be available at the back of the box, also the Microsoft Company log is at the bottom right hand instead of top right hand. People have noted incorrectly that the new design looks similar to Microsofts Office for Mac 2004 product boxes, the answer is simply, no. Also Office 2004 product boxes use a unique design its still different and retains more of the 4 edge look with equal sides. Its a strong theme that speaks elegance and simplicity, I must say, I love it. Good job Microsoft!

Resources:
Windows Vista Product Editions Page
Windows Vista Team Blog

Technorati tags: Windows Vista Packages, Product Boxes, SKU, Editions, Retail, OEM, Annnouncement, Featured News, Packaging.

AERO Glass - The Cut Off Point

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:27:57 GMT

So I have been running Windows Vista RC2 Build 5744 x64 for a while now, but there is one trade off since installing the OS, I don't get Glass. There have been hints that this would happen, ever since build 5472 I have had to manually enable Glass everytime I install the 64-Bit platform. Also, the Slide Show Photo Album effects were not available, instead images were shown in Basic mode.

Desktop PC Specs:
Generic AMD 64 Machine
AMD Sempron 1.6 GHz
512 MBs of RAM
nVidia Geforce FX 5200 128 MB AGP

It seems the root cause is the amount of memory in the system, 512 is just not going to cut it seems is what Microsoft is saying. I have the same GPU on another desktop running 32 bit Vista RC2 with 2 GBs of RAM and I get Glass just fine. What is probably strange and annoying about all of this is, on builds prior to 5744, I got Glass just fine, some I had to manually enable it by going to Personalization explorer > Windows Color and Appearances. But the fact is, Glass worked, now I am left with the ugly theme AERO Basic which I consider to be a downgrade from XP's Luna.

So, where does this leave me? Well, one things for sure, I won't be upgrading any of my systems at home to Vista, since Microsoft is suggesting that they are not powerful enough to run the OS properly. I believe I might be setting myself up for a trap if I do decide to upgrade the memory, I don't want to find out later after adding another 512 module that the GPU is not powerful for AERO Glass and I need to upgrade that. This ultimately means, I won't be experiencing Vista at home until I purchase my next PC, which won't be until some really new systems hit the market at a comfortable price point. With the advances in CPU and GPU coming from companies such as Intel, AMD, nVidia and ATI (Quad Core, Direct X 10 capable cards), its best I at least wait until the 4th quarter of 2007 to make the move to Vista.

I want a great experience not one thats half ass, I don't want to know that, this is not fully working because, this piece of hardware is not powerful enough. Overall, I am disappointed that Microsoft would intentionally add an artificial cut off point for AERO Glass. After experiencing it for several months on the same system using 14 builds. Glass makes so much difference when using the PC, its almost like night and day compared to AERO Basic and Windows Classic Themes, productivity enhancements such as Flip 3D, LiveTaskbar Thumbnails, Alt-Tab 2D and just a refreshing interface thats easy on the eyes make Glass an enticing part of using Vista. Still, I am hoping this is not the case and we will see something different by RTM, but if it is, I must say this is one lousy move. Looking at it from the point of view as a consumer, that has my system requirements, goes out and spends $400 on Vista Ultimate, installs it to find out you need to upgrade hardware just to get a better experience is a slap in the face I won't accept. In the mean time, Vista at work it is!

Technorati tags: AERO Glass, Themes, Windows, Vista RC2, Flip 3D, Alt-Tab 2d, Windows Classic, AERO Basic, Graphics, RAM, Memory, System Requirement, GPU, Pixel Shader, nVidia, 5744, 64-bit, x64, x86, 32-bit.

Testing Virtual PC 2007 BETA on Windows Vista RC2

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:16:43 GMT

Microsoft today released their client Virtualization solution Virtual PC 2007 with support for both 64-bit and 32-bit Windows XP and Vista. I hastily downloaded to try out the new release and I must I am pleased so far. All of my existing Virtual Machines work without a hitch, performance is good and everything just work like it does on XP. Version 2004 was known for its incompatibility with Vista, especially since there was no native 64-bit version available.

Installing Virtual PC 2007 on Windows Vista RC2 (click to enlarge)

Installation
Was a cinch, I accepted the EULA, entered my user information, selected the default location and was done in less than 5 mins. After installation was completed, I was greeted by the Add a New Virtual Machine wizard. Adding a new Virtual Machine is just the same as version 2004 with the exception of Windows Vista now being a supported operating system from OS listings.

Adding and Configuring Virtual Machines in Virtual PC 2007

Usage
As previously said, not much has changed in this release with exception of full Windows compatibility. I was able to use existing VHDs stored on another partition and they ran perfectly. I have tried three classic operating systems so far, Windows 95, NT 4, 98 and ME all work as expected. Some small issues remain such as Print Screening the Virtual Machine window, which nothing out of the ordinary since its something rarely done unless you take lots of screenshots. I wish there was a better way of switching between Guest and Host in full screen mode. The keyboard acrobatics become daunting after a while, I suggest, maybe a switch between solution by adding a VPC icon in the notification area for both modes, similar to a Virtual Desktop.

Windows operating systems running on Windows Vista RC2 in Virtual PC 2007
(click to enlarge)

Overall, this release strengthens Microsoft's commitment to Virtualization, I don't know if this release will get anybody switching from VM Ware, but it just might since it is free. Virtual PC 2007 supports Windows Vista editions, Business, Enterprise and Ultimate for both Guest and Host.

You can sign up to test this new release by going the Microsoft Connect website and click the link available connections.

Technorati tags: Microsoft, Virtual PC 2007, Windows Vista, Vista, 64-bit, 32-bit, Virtualization, Virtual Machine, .VHD, Vista RC2, Windows, VPC 07.

A look at Windows Live OneCare 1.5 on Vista RC2

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:39:40 GMT

Recently, Microsoft released an update to their successful Consumer Security suite, Windows Live OneCare 1.5 for Windows Vista RC1 x86 (32-bit) or later. OneCare is Microsoft's first foray into the desktop security market which includes Antivirus, Malware and Anti-Phishing Protection. The Company's first product to be released into BETA was Windows Defender formerly Windows AntiSpyware purchased from GIANT in late 2004. In this review, I take a look at installing, configuring and maintaining Live OneCare 1.5 on the recent RC2 update for Vista, build 5744 x86. There are no plans at this time to make the suite available for Windows Vista x64, users of that platform will still have to depend on third party solutions such as Trend Micro Internet Security.

So what is new in this special release for Windows Vista. Not much except for compatibility, OneCare Live strengthens existing Security tools already included in the OS, such as Windows Defender, Internet Explorer 7 AntiPhising by adding a much needed Antivirus utility. Integration is also utilized through other features such as Windows Vista's Backup Center Utility.

Installing Windows Live OneCare 1.5 (click image to enlarge)

Installation
I have to say this is probably the most refreshing installation of software I have had in a while, it was just straight forward, quick and easy. To get OneCare Live 1.5 first you have to sign up by clicking the available link for the software at http://ideas.live.com which will take you to a page where you will enter your E-mail address and click a link to begin downloading the software. A small 1 Mb executable is downloaded, after which you run and the setup process begins. You cannot download the entire software to your local disk, the entire installation is done through the website. Its a sort distinct hint of Web 2.0 by delivering software this way which promises to deliver the most up to date releases of Windows Care. The installation time depends on the speed of your Internet connection, for me it was finish within 10 min's, after which I was required to restart to complete the installation.

Windows OneCare Live 1.5 Signup and Download Page. (click image to enlarge)

After restarting and logging back into my account, I was greeted by a Windows OneCare Live splash screen which then displayed a status window indicating the software was installed successfully and can be found in the notification area. The OneCare Live main window was also opened ready to configure and adjust any settings. The Anti-Phishing utility is not turned on by default, this I did, next I activated the software which gave me a 180 day trial period (cool). I don't know if this is available to everyone, Paul Thurrott noted on his WinInfomant page a 90 day trial period.

Activation
Is simple and requires that you have a Windows Live ID, MSN or Hotmail account. During the activation process, the wizard checks if you already have an existing account, I believe this is how I got the 180 day trial, since I am already a perpetual beta tester for the OneCare software on Windows XP. The entire process was simple, no problems occurred.

Activating Windows Live OneCare 1.5 (click to enlarge image)

Using Windows Live OneCare
When you first launch the software you are greeted by the status window which gives you a quick overview of what's going one, indicators include Update to Date (Green), Needs Attention (Amber), You Are At Risk (Red). The three status listings on the main page are Protection Plus for Antivirus, Performance Plus which does things such as defragmenter and disk cleanup, check for updates and files that need backing up. Next is Backup and Restore which protects your files by backing them up to removal storage such as a USB external hard disk, CD/CD RW or DVD/DVD RW or even a Network Location if these options are available to you.

Windows Live OneCare Status windows and Vista Security Center integration.
(click image to enlarge)

What I find kind of ironic is the security technologies if Windows Vista and Live OneCare, when certain actions are executed, such as managing settings, starting a backup or tune up, the UAC dialog is launched before you can begin the process. I just find it strange, knowing its a Microsoft product also and it is not speared the notification. Live OneCare includes its own Firewall utility which replaces the Windows Vista Firewall as the default one which handles both incoming and out going request. Windows Defender which is already a part of WLO package for XP and included with Windows Vista provides better integration through centralized management along with the Antivirus. Upon completion of install, the Media Center Extender on the Xbox 360 would not launch. After further investigation, I found out one needs to open OneCare, then go to Change OneCare Settings > Firewall > Advanced Settings > Ports and Protocols and enable: Xbox 360 and Media Center Extenders and Xbox 360 and Windows Media Connect Devices once you do this, then your extender will connect. Thanks to Brian Kvalheim for the tip.

Conclusion
Windows OneCare Live 1.5 is a great addition to the security portfolio in Windows Vista. The performance is superior in comparison to the other security products such as Norton Antivirus and MacAfee AV. System performance has not depreciated also which is a common characteristic of the more popular AV's out on the market, its easy to use and manage plus it provides a great out of box experience. The interface is also easy to understand and navigate, I wish there was better automated detection of hardware devices such as the XBOX and Media Center port blocking which are also Microsoft products. There should also be a trust relationship between UAC and WLO, I am sick of the security alerts, but I don't want to turn them off simply because I like a clean, green security center. Overall, I like it and I think you will too.

Download Windows Live OneCare 1.5 for Windows Vista RC1 x86 or later HERE
Get Windows Vista RC2 HERE

Technorati tags: Windows Live, Windows Live OneCare, Windows Vista, Windows Vista RC1, Antivirus, Security, Build 5600, Windows Vista RC2, Build 5744, Reviews

The Windows Vista Fit & Finish Saga continues

Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:42:49 GMT

The Windows Vista Team notes on their blog that a lot of UI elements have been updated, and the effort continues. I know we won't see every icon updated, for instance, there is a good amount of legacy icons situated in the Windows folder, but I suspect because this is not a often accessed location they will be skipped.

I still see a few old XP style icons here and there and some UI inconsistences I would like to point out.

The Windows Update, Taskbar & Start menu icons in Control Panel are not updated to be scaled at a large size. The Windows Update globe in particular has not been updated to feature that level of realism that you see on globe based icons throughout Windows Vista such as those for Internet Connection, Regional Settings and iSCSI Initiator. It also uses the old XP style Windows flag.

Next up are some dialogs that still feature old XP style icons, such as the Previous Versions tab, found on the Properties of a file. The System Properties > Hardware tab, still feature two prominent XP style icons: Device Manager (which does not sync with Add/Hardware device icon found in Control Panel) and Windows Update which was previously noted.

Finally, I come to one small iconsistency which is very, very small, the Taskbar and Start Menu Properties > Taskbar tab displays a preview of the Taskbar appearance. From what I can see the image is stretched. If I compare to an image of my Taskbar, its safe to say, the image was not cropped properly by the person responsible for this area and was stretched instead.

Microsofts Taskbar

My Taskbar in Windows Vista 5728

Overall, Microsoft has done an amazing job, and like they said, the effort continues to update as much as possible. The interface is superb and I must give kudos to the folks on the Shell Team for their hard work and dedication to making this the best user experience possible. Some areas of Windows Vista I believe were left in an unfortunate position, such as the common Windows applications, Word Pad, Paint basically "untouched". I don't know what the user studies show, but to me they look pretty much out of place, the last time they got a face lift was with transition to Windows 95. I was hoping that Microsoft Paint at least would adapt some of the charateristics of a modern graphics application featuring tighter integration with new applications such as Photo Gallery and set of more accessible tools. Oh, just one last thing before I post, the Ultimate Extras icon has not been updated to be scaled to a large size when selected.

Resources:
Shell Revealed

Office 2000 runs just fine on Vista thank you!

Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:05:36 GMT

Application compatibility is one of the biggest hurdles when it comes to moving or transitioning to Windows Vista. Microsoft has made a concerted effort to deliver a unique experience over past versions of Windows in Vista for both businesses and consumers, these include Application Compatibility (first introduced in Windows XP), the new Application Compatibility Wizard to help identify which applications on your system are not working properly with Windows, Windows Upgrade Advisor to determine if you have the necessary requirements and settings to successfully install Windows Vista and the soon to be released (in beta) Virtual PC 2007 to run a prior version of Windows on top of Windows Vista that supports your legacy applications.

For me, I have had minimal trouble with compatibility on Windows Vista, the only problem for me is my USB E398 and C350 Motorola Cellular phones are not fully compatible with Vista, the root cause is the Motorola Mobile Phone Tools software developed by BVPR. Hopefully sometime after Vista is Released to Manufacturering, they will have a supported device driver and working software.

I have been running some old applications such as Office 2000 Premium SR1 and Adobe Photoshop 6 on the latest Vista builds 5600 (RC1) and 5728 and I am surprised how functional they are, no glitches or errors during installation or during daily use. I did not have to run either compatibility mode, both also run at optimal performance. Many corporations are still on versions of Office such as 2000 and XP and are usually slow at moving to more recent releases, upgrade cycles can factor in a combination of both new and old software. Its reassuring knowing that you can take advantage of the latest operating system while keeping older productivity and graphics software without affecting your TCO. Of course Microsoft will recommend a Vista/Office 2007 deployment strategy, but I am sure most IT Departments and CIO's are realist and the case will be a either or approach to moving to Office 2007 and Vista for many.

Resources
http://windowsconnected.com/blogs/joshs_blog/archive/2006/01/07/295.aspx
ActiveWin.com: Release Candidate 1 Preview (Build 5600)

My Release Candidate 1 (Build 5600) Review of Windows Vista now on ActiveWin

Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:12:36 GMT

From ActiveWin.com

Quote:

"You tend to get a bit jaded about beta software especially after testing 12 pre-release builds of it over a 14 month period, slowly watching it at times fall and progress. Windows Vista has been five years in the making; throughout that time we have seen Microsoft delay the release of this “major upgrade” over and over and over again. But the Company throughout that tumultuous time did manage to pick up the pieces and literally start all over again. Now with the 13^th and possibly final test build; Release Candidate 1, we are only a stones throw away from Release To Manufacturing (RTM)."

Read the rest here

My Pre-Release Candidate 1 Preview of Windows Vista now on ActiveWin

Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:35:25 GMT

From ActiveWin.com

Quote:

" I have just posted his 21-page Microsoft Windows Vista Pre-RC 1 preview (Builds 5472 and 5536). In the preview, he discusses load times, installation times, an array of features (IE 7, multimedia, advanced, etc.) and much more. Included are over 20 screenshots. Below is an excerpt:

For me, installing the operating system has been a varied experience depending on the hardware; I tried different machines, all which successfully installed a combination of x86 and x64 platforms. The BETA 2 build released in May installed in approximately 35 to 40 minutes on both 32 and 64 bit hardware. Microsoft has since released updated builds (5456, 5472) otherwise known as interim releases. I recently installed 5472 (x86); the install time on my desktop and laptop were 59 minutes and 54 minutes respectively. A significant drop in performance there compared to build (5384 – BETA 2). Although we should take into consideration 5472 x64 is an interim release and does not reflect the same quality, as a milestone build such as BETA 2 or RC1 will be. Hopefully I will see changes to this area as development progresses, but fluctuation in performance has been a number one problem since BETA 1."

Read the rest here

My Preview of Internet Explorer RC1 - now on Windows Connected

Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:49:18 GMT

From Windows Connected

Everybody knows Internet Explorer, whether you hate it or love it, it’s the most popular web browser around the world. Apart from the new user interface, which seems a bit squeezed, Internet Explorer 7 biggest features are Security and Really Simple Syndication. RSS allows the user to subscribe to their favorite website’s and receive notifications of updates to those subscribed sites without the need to individually browse each to check for new information. An orange button (also used by FireFox) indicates when a site is RSS enabled, click it and you are presented in a Feed view of the particular site, which you can then save and add to your collection of feeds in the Favorites Center. You can set the browser to download new updates automatically at certain intervals.

Read the entire preview here

Should Windows Vista be delayed?

Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:52:22 GMT

You betacha!

The buzz around the web is about the state of Windows Vista and if its ready for prime time, especially with Release Candidate 1 approaching so quickly. Robert Mclaws of Longhorn Blogs, summarizes all the reasons nicely why Vista in its current state is still not eligible for RC1 designation and why a BETA 3 release would actually do the development of the OS and the Team of Developers some real good. But of course its just wishful thinkful and although Microsoft will consider it, it will be more like a passing thought I say.

I believe Microsoft is still worrying about the shareholders and the lost in revenue that would have come from renewed Software Assurance and Enterprise Agreements. Microsoft would need to justify a really good reason for waiting a little bit longer, especially after almost 5 years of development. But, I certainly do agree with delaying the product, and I have reason to, the lousy performance I am currently experiencing on the latest interim build 5472 and the BETA 2 release 5384 make it seem desparate. I know I might not have the fastest or the greatest systems in the world, but come on, 10 minutes for 5472 x64 to reach the Welcome Screen? With a lot of businesses not planning on deploying Vista for another 2 or more years, would it not make sense to honestly concentrate on quality which was the original goal of the product in the begining?

Microsoft has done a good job on driver detection so far, although earlier builds got me to a boiling point I got completely fedup with the product. What also continues to bother me and others is the enormous regressions with each new build, I just want to see something fixed and stay fixed. Is that too much to ask for? I don't know if the Windows Team has a trick up their sleeve, but I am sick of waiting, it would be a good time to pull it out with the next release so we can at least have some confidence in Vista again. Seriously, delaying it for another 6 to 12 would help a lot, since most test pilots on this product are really gonna start when this product RTMs anyway.

Taking another look at the Windows Vista Upgrade Paths

Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:29:43 GMT

So Microsoft finally revealed the upgrade paths for Windows Vista. I have to say I am mostly pleased and a bit disappointed. The upgrade matrix at first seems confusing, but when you finally figure it out, its pretty much straightforward. The biggest news is that Windows 2000 Professional and XP Professional x64 will not have any supported upgrade paths at all. Of course its surprising knowing the millions of users still running 2000 especially on modern hardware. XP Professional x64 is one where making a compromise is what its all about because of the reliability initiative Microsoft is planning to implement with Vista x64 with the new kernel mode driver signing which I reported in my Windows XP Professional x64 Year in Review article for ActiveWin.com and in my recent preview of Windows Vista Build 5472 x64 for Extended64.

Windows Vista Upgrade Matrix

In March I discussed the possible upgrade paths with a fair amount of the predictions being correct. The only thing I got wrong of course was the Windows Vista/XP Professional x64 upgrade paths. Of course, Windows Vista Enterprise is equivalent in most features to Vista Business and Ultimate Editions, but because its only available to Software Assurance and Enterprise Agreement customers was not listed on the chart.

To be honest though, is an inplace upgrade to Windows Vista even worth it? A majority of most installs are successfully done as clean installs with most reports currently saying failed upgrades from XP to Vista. My recommendation to most people in the first place is to back up your existing data and do a clean install, its better that way and guarantees a stable system.

You can check out my getting started guide I did for Windows Connected for more information on installing and preparing for Windows Vista here

Upgrade paths to Windows Vista

1. Windows XP Home Edition: Windows Vista Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Enterprise Edition* and Ultimate Edition

2. Windows XP Professional: Windows Vista Business, Enterprise Edition *, Ultimate Edition

3. Windows XP Tablet PC Edition: Windows Vista Business, Enterprise Edition *, Ultimate Edition

XP Tablet PC Edition is similar in architecture to XP Professional with additional support for inking.

4. Windows XP Media Center Edition: Windows Vista Home Premium, Ultimate Edition

XP Media Center Edition makes a logical step to the above Vista Editions since those Editions are the only ones that will include the Media Center Software.

5. Windows XP Professional x64 Edition: Windows Vista Business x64, Enterprise Edition x64*, Ultimate Edition x64

*Enterprise Edition will only be available under Microsoft's Software Assurance and Enterprise Agreement Programs.

You can read the entire March article here

A Closer Look at Windows Vista Build 5472 x64

Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:36:43 GMT

From Extended64

Quote:

"Starting in early 2007, Microsoft will launch the release of Windows Vista, its first major operating system upgrade since Windows XP (2001). The BETA 2 release of the OS I tested has shown tremendous improvements in areas such as stability, allowing for the ability to use it on a daily basis. Like its predecessor Windows XP, Vista has improved deployment options and device driver detection; these options have proven to be very user friendly and reduced the time it takes to get Windows up and running.

Of course, Windows Vista is still rough around the edges and there is a lot to be said about the performance which is no where near that of Windows XP. A new feature User Access Control is sure to cause more annoyance than its intended purpose which is to protect users; Windows Vista will be available in six editions."

Read the entire preview here

Related Links & Resources

Windows Connected Getting Ready for Windows Vista BETA 2 - Quickstarter/Guide

Windows Vista 5308 - A Mature Release (ActiveWin - Part I)

Windows Vista 5270 - A Look At Some of the Progress So Far
Windows Vista 5231 - Testing, Testing...

Windows Vista 5219 (September CTP) – The Inspection

Windows Vista Beta 1 (Build 5112) - The Inspection
Longhorn Build 5048 - The Inspection
Longhorn - A Very Delicate Subject
The Progress of Windows Longhorn
Longhorn Build 5203 - An Analysis
Vista: A Scenic View Into The Future of Windows

The first set of Windows Vista Install Scores are In!

Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:00:46 GMT

The installation results for Windows Vista Ultimate (x86) build 5472 are in. I was able to get the OS installed on two of my systems, a Desktop and Laptop. I still have not downloaded the x64 build of Vista 5472, so the results for that will come later during the week or some time next week.

System Specs: Desktop

Dell Dimension 8300 (March 2004)

3.2 GHz Pentium 4 with HT (32-Bit)

2.6 GBs of RAM

nVidia Geforce FX 5200 128 MB AGP

Install Time:

04 mins: Setup

26 mins: Copying Files

18 mins: Expanding Files

04 mins: (Restart) Continuing Setup

01 mins: Installing Updates

01 mins: Restart

01 mins: Please wait a moment while Windows prepares to start for the first time.

04 mins: Completing Installation

01 mins: Restart

01 mins: Please wait while Windows checks the performance of your Computer.

Total time: 1hr 1min (61 mins)

Obviously this is not a major improvement and more of a step back from past builds which had install times down to 34 minutes. It’s a regression really and I am hoping for changes to this in at least the RC1 release and maybe something more in the RTM release.

System Specs: Laptop

Dell Latitude c840 (September 2003)

2.0 GHz Pentium 4 M

768 MBs of RAM

nVidia Geforce4 440 Go 32 MB

Install Time:

04 mins: Setup

09 mins: Copying Files

14 mins: Expanding Files

03 mins: (Restart) Continuing Setup

01 mins: Installing Updates

03 mins: Restart

04 mins: Please wait a moment while Windows prepares to start for the first time.

14 mins: Completing Installation

01 mins: Restart

04 mins: Please wait while Windows checks the performance of your Computer.

Total time: 57 mins

Again, not impressive, but we must also take into account, this is an interim release of Windows Vista, not a milestone build like BETA 2 or what RC1 will be. I agree, it’s not something to call home about, but the operating system in general has shown some increase in performance, its more responsive, windows pop up and applications launch much faster, which makes it a pleasant experience for daily.

I can’t wait to try out the 64-bit version of Vista and relay my experiences here, still I am doubtful if I will be impressed, Vista overall continues to be refined, and this release is just one step in the journey towards the final release.

I am still concerned about the new Windows Basic Theme for Vista

Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:37:05 GMT

I just checked out the new Windows Vista Basic (Standard) theme on the Windows Vista Team Blog and I must say I am still not impressed. I first saw a glimpse of it on Brandon Leblanc's (Sidebar Geek) blog at the Hive.net, thanks for catching it.

The Windows Vista's Team idea of improvement.

Why can't the Windows Vista Team go the extra mile, why must they be so darn cheap? What in heaven's name could make you really want to give us those lousy Minimize, Restore and Maxmize buttons? Seriously, you can't tell me those buttons in the Windows Vista AERO theme actually require a Dual core processor, with a 2 GBs of RAM, 512 MB video card????? I am frustrated with the lack of focus on the UI in Windows Vista, its just so embarassing, why can't you hire some interns from a graphics school or something to just focus on fixing those little UI problems we have been seeing in Windows Vista since BETA 1, that we were told would be fixed in "BETA 2"???

Give us what we really deserve!

Another thing, you are honestly telling me, the floating user icon on the AERO Start menu in Vista requires Glass too? Hello no, I don't think so! If this is a tactic you are using for people to shell out cash on the premium editions of Vista then you are seriously embarassing me and yourselves. Also, the white Windows logo on the Classic Start menu button looks like you ran out of paint. I still don't see what was so difficult about including the Windows XP LUNA themes and just stick a search box on the Start panel and call it a day. I love Glass, but I hate Basic, my laptop is currently using Basic because of the video card (32 MB - Geforce 4 440 Go). It runs XP just fine, no issues, 2 GHz P4 M, 768 MBs of RAM, but it barely can even open Solitaire in Vista. Its sad!

Check out the Windows Vista Team Blog here

Microsoft Windows XP x64 Edition: Year in Review

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:07:46 GMT

From ActiveWin | Extended64

Qoute:

"Windows XP Professional x64 was released to market April 25^th, 2005. It has been one year since its release, how is it faring so far?

Adoption is a bit difficult to determine, but based on the strong newsgroup activity from persons in the Windows 64-bit General newsgroups, I would say it’s healthy. A majority of persons though will encounter issues when it comes to application and device driver compatibility. This continues to be ironed out as developers have gradually released updated drivers and workarounds to support existing applications and hardware devices.

A few enthusiast and help sites have popped up on the net also, catering to this release of Windows XP, all have been playing an important role in helping users with issues that they may encounter transitioning to or using the operating system.

The question posed by many about Windows XP x64, is it ready for the mainstream yet? My answer of course would be no. The release is probably a defining transition in Microsoft’s history, proving the Company’s agility and the ability to move with the times and conform to changes in the Computer industry. What some users must realize is, with those moves come a certain responsibility and sacrifice that needs to be made while transitioning to a new platform and developing to take advantage of a new architecture.

Read the rest here

Talking About Possible Windows XP Upgrade Paths to Windows Vista

Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:24:48 GMT

You could probably say Microsoft has started their marketing engine for the next version of Windows, Vista expected sometime in the second half of 2006. The Company recently revealed Editions or (Stock Keeping Units) Vista will be available in, you can check that out here

So the question is what will be the upgrade paths from from Previous versions of Windows such as XP and 2000 Professional?

Users of Windows XP Professional x86, x64 or 2000 Professional must upgrade to Windows Vista Business, Enterprise or Ultimate because those Vista SKU's share the same common core architecture with Microsofts previous generation Business operating systems. Note, I am referring to valid upgrade paths, and other
features that might be relevant to XP Professional and 2000 Professional users such as Domain Join, Group Policy Editor, Encryption and mobilityfeatures.

So, don't expect to have an upgrade path from XP Professional x64 to Vista Home Premium x64, thats invalid.